The Effect of Plyometric and Balance Training Methods on 100 Metres Running Ability in Junior High School Students State 2 Bitung

Riwi Alviolita Tanod; Nolfie Piri; Jan Lengkong

doi:10.62951/ijph.v1i4.210

Authors

Riwi Alviolita Tanod Universitas Negeri Manado
Nolfie Piri Universitas Negeri Manado
Jan Lengkong Universitas Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijph.v1i4.210

Keywords:

Plyometric, Balance, Training, Running

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) The difference in the effect of plyometric training methods between double leg bound training and double leg vertical power jump training on 100-meter running ability, (2) The difference in the effect between high balance and low balance on 100-meter running ability, (3) Interaction between plyometric and balance training methods on 100-meter running ability. The instruments used to collect data were: (1) Balance test (Modified Bass Test of Dynamic Balance), (2) 100-meter running ability test with time test, (3) Training program as a guideline that will be used in providing treatment . The data analysis technique used was Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of α = 0.05. The results of the hypothesis testing proved that: (1) There is no difference in the influence between double leg bound training and double leg vertical power jump training on 100-meter running ability. By looking at the similarity of the movements that both jump use both legs, it seems that these two exercises are variations in training, as a result the two plyometric training methods are not significantly different. (2) There is a difference in the influence between high balance and low balance on 100-meter running ability. The results of the data analysis showed that high balance has a significant difference in influence with low balance. (3) There is no interaction of influence between plyometric and balance training methods on 100-meter running ability. Related to the interaction hypothesis, it turns out that the results of the hypothesis testing have proven that there is no interaction between plyometric and balance training methods on 100-meter running ability where the calculated F value = 0.006 < than the F table value = 2.82 at a significance level of α = 0.05. Conclusion of the study: 1) There is no significant difference in influence between double leg bound training and double leg vertical power jump training on 100-meter running ability. 2) There is a significant difference in the influence of high balance and low balance on 100-meter running ability. 3) There is no interaction between plyometric training methods and balance on 100-meter running ability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aktaş, A. (2019). Relationship between isokinetic leg strength and dynamic balance performance of elite male volleyball players. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i7.4328

Al-Ahmari, M. (2022). Pre and postoperative physiotherapy in foot and ankle surgery: Role, impact, and importance. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 9(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20221518

Alcacer-Pitarch, A., et al. (2019). Provision of foot and ankle care services for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease across Europe. Musculoskeletal Care, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1431

Ambegaonkar, J. P., et al. (2011). Ankle stabilizers affect agility but not vertical jump or dynamic balance performance. Foot & Ankle Specialist, 4(6), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640011428509

Chander, A., et al. (2015). The influence of occupational footwear on dynamic balance perturbations. Footwear Science, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2015.1031193

Chitlange, A. (2023). Comprehensive rehabilitation of Charcot foot with equinovarus deformity: A case report. Cureus, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48431

Denerel, H., et al. (2019). The acute effects of static and dynamic stretching exercises on dynamic balance performance. Turkish Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjsm.2019.127

Griffis, A., et al. (2021). Cystic benign bone tumors in weight-bearing bones of the foot: A report of three cases and review of the literature. Foot & Ankle Surgery Techniques Reports & Cases, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fastrc.2021.100095

Laplaca, J., & Seedman, J. (2020). The importance of the foot and ankle in athletic performance. Strength and Conditioning, 42(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1519/ssc.0000000000000598

Presley, J. C., et al. (2013). Sonographic visualization of the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve (Baxter nerve). Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 32(9), 1643–1650. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.9.1643

Schepers, J., & Rammelt, M. (2020). Peer reviewing in foot and ankle surgery: Is there a limit to scientific altruism? Fuß & Sprunggelenk, 18(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuspru.2020.07.002

Thevendran, A., et al. (2017). Perceived risk factors for nonunion following foot and ankle arthrodesis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017692703

Vasukutty, A., et al. (2017). Operative treatment of calcaneal fractures: Improved outcomes and low complication rates with a strict management protocol. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 99(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0259

Villiers, S. D., & Venter, J. (2014). Barefoot training improved ankle stability and agility in netball players. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 9(3), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.9.3.485

Walsh, K., et al. (2019). Management of musculoskeletal foot and ankle conditions prior to public‐sector orthopaedic referral in South Australia. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-019-0331-4